Bug Prioritization Framework: How to Decide What to Fix First

Your bug backlog is growing. Some bugs break critical features, others are cosmetic. Some affect your largest customer, others affect no one actively. How do you decide what to fix first?

This guide provides a complete bug prioritization framework that you can implement today—from severity definitions to scoring systems to team processes.

Why Prioritization Matters

Poor prioritization has cascading effects:

• Wrong bugs get fixed: Engineers work on cosmetic issues while critical bugs persist
• Users lose trust: Important issues go unresolved for weeks
• Team morale suffers: Constant firefighting feels chaotic
• Resources waste: Time spent on low-impact work

Good prioritization ensures your limited engineering time goes where it matters most.

The Severity × Impact Matrix

The foundation of bug prioritization is a 2×2 matrix:

text
                    High User Impact
                          │
    P1: Fix Now           │       P2: Fix This Week
    (Critical bugs        │       (Major bugs
     affecting many)      │        affecting many)
                          │
Low Severity ─────────────┼───────────────── High Severity
                          │
    P4: Backlog           │       P3: Fix This Sprint
    (Minor bugs           │       (Critical bugs
     affecting few)       │        affecting few)
                          │
                    Low User Impact

Defining Severity

Severity measures the technical impact of the bug:

Severity	Definition	Examples
Critical	System unusable, data loss, security breach	App crash, payment failure, data corruption
High	Major feature broken, no workaround	Can't export, search broken, auth failing
Medium	Feature impaired, workaround exists	Slow performance, UI glitch with refresh fix
Low	Minor issue, cosmetic	Typo, alignment off, color wrong

Defining User Impact

User impact measures who's affected and how many:

Impact	Definition	Examples
Critical	All users affected	Homepage down, login broken for everyone
High	Many users or key customers	Feature used by 50%+, enterprise client affected
Medium	Some users affected	Feature used by 10-50%, specific browser issue
Low	Few users affected	Edge case, rare configuration, single user

Priority Levels

Combine severity and impact into actionable priorities:

P1: Critical (Fix Immediately)

• High severity + High impact
• Drop everything and fix
• All hands if needed
• Communication to users required

Response time: < 4 hours

P2: High (Fix This Week)

• High severity + Medium impact, OR
• Medium severity + High impact
• Planned for current sprint
• May require on-call attention

Response time: < 24 hours

P3: Medium (Fix This Sprint)

• Medium severity + Medium impact
• High severity + Low impact
• Scheduled in sprint planning
• Won't interrupt current work

Response time: < 1 week

P4: Low (Backlog)

• Low severity (any impact)
• Medium severity + Low impact
• Fix when convenient
• May be closed as "won't fix"

Response time: When possible

Scoring System

For more granular prioritization, use a scoring formula:

text
Priority Score = (Severity × 3) + (User Impact × 2) + (Trend × 1)

Where:

• Severity: 1-4 (low to critical)
• User Impact: 1-4 (few to all users)
• Trend: 1-4 (stable to rapidly increasing)

Example Calculations

Bug A: Payment failing (Severity 4), affects 20% of users (Impact 3), stable (Trend 2)

text
Score = (4 × 3) + (3 × 2) + (2 × 1) = 12 + 6 + 2 = 20

Bug B: UI misalignment (Severity 1), affects 80% of users (Impact 4), stable (Trend 2)

text
Score = (1 × 3) + (4 × 2) + (2 × 1) = 3 + 8 + 2 = 13

Bug A gets priority despite affecting fewer users.

Factors to Consider

Beyond the matrix, consider these factors:

Customer Value

• Does this affect paying customers?
• Are enterprise accounts impacted?
• Is a key renewal at risk?

Weight bugs from high-value customers more heavily.

Workaround Availability

• Can users accomplish their goal another way?
• How painful is the workaround?

Bugs with no workaround get higher priority.

Reproducibility

• Can you reliably reproduce the bug?
• Is it intermittent or consistent?

Hard-to-reproduce bugs may need more investigation time.

Age of Bug

• How long has this been reported?
• Are reports increasing?

Old bugs with increasing reports deserve attention.

Fix Complexity

• Quick fix or architectural change?
• Who can fix it?

Sometimes a quick win beats a bigger priority.

Automation with AI

Manual prioritization doesn't scale. AI triage can automate:

Automatic Severity Detection

Keywords and patterns indicate severity:

• "crash", "data loss", "security" → Critical
• "can't", "broken", "failing" → High
• "slow", "sometimes", "minor" → Medium
• "typo", "color", "alignment" → Low

User Impact Estimation

AI can estimate impact by:

• Checking error rates in logs
• Counting similar past reports
• Analyzing affected user segments

Priority Assignment

Combined into automatic priority:

typescript
function calculatePriority(bug: Bug): Priority {
  const severity = classifySeverity(bug.description);
  const impact = estimateImpact(bug.metadata);

  if (severity >= 3 && impact >= 3) return 'P1';
  if (severity >= 3 || impact >= 3) return 'P2';
  if (severity >= 2 && impact >= 2) return 'P3';
  return 'P4';
}

Team Process

Prioritization isn't just a formula—it's a process.

Daily Triage

• Review new bugs each morning
• Assign initial priority
• Escalate P1s immediately
• 15 minutes max

Weekly Review

• Review P2/P3 backlog
• Adjust priorities based on new information
• Close stale bugs
• 30 minutes with the team

Sprint Planning

• Include bug budget (e.g., 20% of sprint)
• Pull from prioritized backlog
• Balance bugs with features

Retrospective

• Which bugs took longer than expected?
• Did priority assignments hold up?
• What should we prioritize differently?

Common Mistakes

Everything Is P1

If everything is critical, nothing is. Be disciplined about true P1s—you should have very few.

Ignoring User Reports

Duplicate reports are signal. 10 users reporting the same issue means it's higher impact than you thought.

No Regular Review

Priorities change. What was P3 last month might be P1 if reports are increasing.

Skipping Low Priority Forever

P4s accumulate and create technical debt. Budget time to clear the backlog periodically.

FAQ

How to prioritize bugs effectively?

Use a Severity × User Impact matrix. Severity measures technical impact (critical to low), while user impact measures who's affected (all users to few users). Combine into priority levels (P1-P4) and review weekly. Automate initial classification with AI to save triage time.

What is bug severity vs priority?

Severity is the technical impact of the bug (how broken something is). Priority is when it should be fixed (P1 = now, P4 = backlog). A critical severity bug affecting one user might be lower priority than a medium severity bug affecting everyone.

How many priority levels should bugs have?

Four levels (P1-P4) work for most teams. Fewer levels (P1-P2) lack nuance; more levels (P1-P6) create decision paralysis. Define each level clearly with response times.

Should all bugs be fixed?

No. Some bugs aren't worth fixing: edge cases affecting no one, cosmetic issues in deprecated features, workarounds that are acceptable. It's okay to close bugs as "won't fix" with explanation.

---

Want automatic bug prioritization? Try BugBrain free and let AI handle initial triage so your team can focus on fixing.